Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Membership
To report any changes to the membership.
Minutes:
1.1 There were no
changes to the membership.
|
2. |
Declarations of Interest
To receive declarations by
Members and Officers of any personal or prejudicial interests in
matters on this agenda.
Minutes:
2.1 Councillor Murad Gassanly declared that in respect of item 2,
15A Elizabeth Street, SW1, the application was in his Ward and so
he withdrew from the Sub-Committee and left the room during
consideration of this item.
|
1. |
Basement to Third Floor, 11 Rathbone Place, W1 PDF 1 MB
App
No
|
Ward /
Cumulative Impact
Area
|
Site Name and
Address
|
Application
|
Licensing Reference
Number
|
1.
|
West End Ward / West
End Cumulative Impact Area
|
Basement to Third
Floor, 11 Rathbone Place, W1
|
New Premises
Licence
|
17/12029/LIPN
|
Minutes:
LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE No. 5
Thursday
21st December 2017
Membership:
Councillor Peter Freeman (Chairman), Councillor Murad Gassanly and
Councillor Rita Begum.
Legal
Adviser:
Barry Panto
Policy
Adviser:
Chris Wroe
Committee Officer: Toby
Howes
Presenting Officer: Yolanda
Wade
Relevant Representations: Environmental Health and the Licensing
Authority
Present:
Jack Spiegler (Solicitor representing
the Applicant Company), Debbie Wosskow
OBE (Founder, Applicant Company), Aret
Kapetanovic (Premises General Manager,
Applicant Company), Sally Fabbricatore
(Environmental Health) and Shannon Pring (Licensing
Authority).
Basement
to Third Floor, 11 Rathbone Place, W1
17/12029/LIPN
|
1.
|
Late
Night Refreshment: Indoors
|
|
Monday to Thursday:
23:00 to 23:30
Friday and
Saturday:
23:00 to 00:00
Seasonal
variations/Non-standard timings:
From the end of permitted hours on New Year's
Eve to the start of permitted hours on New Year's Day
00:00 for licensable activities on Sundays
immediately before Bank Holiday Mondays
00:00 for licensable activities
on International Women's Day (8th March)
|
|
Amendments to application
advised at hearing:
None.
|
|
Decision (including reasons if
different from those set out in report):
This was a new application for
a premises licence within the Cumulative Impact Area in respect of
premises, which, according to the application, would operate as an
all-female office space and private members club.
Jack Spiegler (Solicitor representing the Applicant
Company) introduced the application and drew the
Sub-Committee’s attention to the proposals as set out on
pages 8 and 9 in the report.
Debbie Wosskow OBE (Founder, Applicant Company) then
expanded upon the proposals and confirmed that she was a co-founder
of the AllBright Collective, the
Applicant Company and that she was an entrepreneur in the area of
digital space. The Applicant Company acted as a networking group
for professional women and in particular to help women in
leadership roles and entrepreneurship. Ms Wosskow explained that the intention of the
application was for the premises to provide a workspace and to host
events to inspire women in work and to provide opportunities for
networking. It was also intended that the premises would provide
networking space and the opportunity for women to collaborate and
work together to become leaders. The events would help women in
starting up businesses and female business leaders would be invited
to help inspire other women. Ms Wosskow
added that the premises main use was work based and providing an
environment for women to build on networking.
Mr Spiegler then addressed the Sub-Committtee again and stated that the application
was within core hours and no regulated entertainment had been
applied for. There were a number of conditions proposed and the
Police had withdrawn their representation, whilst there had been no
representations from residents. Mr Spiegler advised that as it was not known exactly
how the basement of the premises was used, a works condition may be
appropriate. He referred to the proposed conditions 9 to 13 in the
report which he remarked were tightly conditioned. This meant that
it would not be feasible for members of the public to come into the
premises for the sole purpose of consuming alcohol. Mr Spiegler suggested ...
view the full minutes text for item 1.
|
|
2. |
15A Elizabeth Street, SW1 PDF 532 KB
App
No
|
Ward /
Cumulative Impact
Area
|
Site Name and
Address
|
Application
|
Licensing Reference
Number
|
2.
|
Churchill Ward / not
in cumulative impact area
|
15A Elizabeth Street,
SW1
|
New Premises
Licence
|
17/11980/LIPN
|
Minutes:
LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE No. 5
Thursday
21st December 2017
Membership:
Councillor Peter Freeman (Chairman) and Councillor Rita
Begum.
Legal
Adviser:
Barry Panto
Policy
Adviser:
Chris Wroe
Committee Officer: Toby
Howes
Presenting Officer: Yolanda
Wade
Relevant Representations: 3 local residents.
Present:
Mr Nir Christodoulou (Applicant Company
Representative).
Declarations of Interest: Councillor Murad Gassanly declared
that the application was in his Ward, withdrew from the
Sub-Committee and left the room during consideration of this
item.
15A
Elizabeth Street, SW1
17/11980/LIPN
|
1.
|
Late
Night Refreshment: Indoors
|
|
Monday to Thursday:
23:00 to 00:00
Friday and
Saturday:
23:00 to 00:30
|
|
Amendments to application
advised at hearing:
The Applicant Company’s
Representative advised of the following amendments
Monday to Saturday:
23:00 to 23:30
|
|
Decision (including reasons if
different from those set out in report):
This was a new
application for a Premises Licence which, according to the
application, was in respect of premises that will operate as a
restaurant and where the sale of alcohol for consumption on the
premises will only be to a person seated, taking a table meal there
and for consumption as ancillary to that table meal.
Mr Nir Christodoulou (Applicant Company
Representative) began by stating
that the intention of the
application was to provide a casual Greek dining experience for
customers. He stated that the proposal to provide alcohol was to
enhance the customer experience by offering drinks such as Greek
wine and all alcohol would be ancillary to food. The Applicant
Company was willing to liaise with local residents about any of
their concerns. Members noted that the Applicant Company had agreed
a number of conditions with Environmental Health and the Police who
had both withdrawn their representations. Mr Christodoulou also
confirmed that the Applicant Company was amending the proposed
terminal hour for late night refreshment to an earlier time of
23:30 Monday to Sunday, 23:00 Monday to Saturday for sale by retail
of alcohol and 23:30 Monday to Saturday for hours the premises are
open to the public.
The Sub-Committee noted the
written representations submitted by 3 local residents.
The Sub-Committee granted the
application. In determining the application, the Sub-Committee
noted that the application was within core hours (apart from the
terminal closing hour on Sunday), with earlier hours proposed than
had been included in the original application. The premises
was also to be food led with alcohol
ancillary to a meal. The Sub-Committee took into account that the
premises was not situated in a
cumulative impact area. It was noted that both Environmental Health
and the Police had withdrawn their representations following
agreeing conditions with the Applicant Company. It was considered
that the issues raised by local residents were largely dealt with
by the reduction in hours offered by the Applicant Company. The
Sub-Committee also considered that the conditions added would help
the Applicant Company to uphold the promotion of the licensing
objectives (prevention of crime and
disorder, prevention of public nuisance, public safety, and
protection of children from harm).
|
2.
|
Sale
by retail of alcohol: On and Off ...
view the full minutes text for item 2.
|
|
3. |
Basement and Ground Floor, 88 Great Portland Street, W1 PDF 992 KB
App
No
|
Ward /
Cumulative Impact
Area
|
Site Name and
Address
|
Application
|
Licensing Reference
Number
|
3.
|
West End Ward / not in
cumulative impact area
|
Basement and Ground
Floor, 88 Great Portland Street, W1
|
New Premises
Licence
|
17/11140/LIPN
|
Minutes:
LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE No. 5
Thursday
21st December 2017
Membership:
Councillor Peter Freeman (Chairman), Councillor Murad Gassanly and
Councillor Rita Begum.
Legal
Adviser:
Barry Panto
Policy
Adviser:
Chris Wroe
Committee Officer: Toby
Howes
Presenting Officer: Yolanda
Wade
Relevant Representations: Environmental Health, Fitzrovia
Neighbourhood Association and 10 local residents
Present:
Charles Holland (Counsel representing the Applicant Company),
Jonathan Millet (Director, Applicant Company), Maxwell Koduah
(Environmental Health), Richard Brown (Solicitor, Citizens Advice
Bureau, representing local residents Sharon Palazzo, Debroah
Knight, Sarah Cole, Frank Thaxton and Anjuli Dhawan), Linus Rees
(Fitzrovia Neighbourhood Association) and Agata Duda (local
resident).
Basement
and Ground Floor, 88 Great Portland Street, W1
17/11140/LIPN
|
1.
|
Films
|
|
Monday to Sunday:
07:00 to 23:00
|
|
Amendments to application
advised at hearing:
None.
|
|
Decision (including reasons if
different from those set out in report):
The application had been
adjourned from a previous hearing held on 14 December in order for
the Applicant Company to address concerns raised at the meeting and
to provide clarification in respect of the proposed operation of
the premises.
This was a new application for
a Premises Licence in respect of premises which, according to the
application, would operate as a nail and beauty salon. The supply
and consumption of alcohol at the premises would be restricted to
patrons attending the premises for, and ancillary to, nail and
beauty treatment as well as the guests of such patrons.
Jonathan Millet
(Director, Applicant Company) began by stating that the application
was for a new nail and beauty salon concept that would offer a
relaxed environment for both working professionals and local
residents. He asserted that the area had a high footfall with many
working professionals employed in the area which made for an ideal
location for a premises of this type. The premises covered over
2,000 square feet, with a large manicure bar located on the ground
floor and the basement used for specialist treatment. The premises
had undergone a high end refurbishment and Mr Millet stated that
the average customer spent 45 to 60 minutes on the premises. The
application to supply alcohol and show films had been made to
enhance the customer experience, however both of these activities
would be ancillary to the premises’ main use as a nail bar.
Mr Millet stated that it was also intended for the premises to be
used by other organisations, such as Estee Lauder, for private
events and if the Sub-Committee agreed to this, the Applicant
Company would be happy to limit such events to a duration of 2.5
hours by condition. Mr Millet stated that the premises would
operate so that working professionals and local residents could
visit in the morning before normal work hours, lunchtime and
earlier in the evening. The premises core hours would be 09:00 to
21:00 and there was already high customer demand, so the premises
may open until 22:00 on some days to accommodate this.
Charles Holland
(Counsel representing the Applicant Company) then addressed the
Sub-Committee and referred to the conditions that had been agreed
between ...
view the full minutes text for item 3.
|
|