Agenda and draft minutes

Basement and Ground Floor, 49 Lexington Street, London, W1F 9AP (“The Premises”)

17/09666/LIPN

1.

Late Night Refreshment - Indoors

Monday to Saturday: 23:00 to 00:30

Sunday: 23:00 to 00:00

Seasonal Variations/Non-Standard Timings:

From the end of permitted hours on New Year’s Eve to the start of permitted hours on New Year’s Day.

Amendments to application advised at hearing:

None.

Decision (including reasons if different from those set out in report):

The Sub-Committee considered an application by Shaftesbury Carnaby Plc for a new premises licence in respect of Basement and Ground Floor, 49 Lexington Street, London, W1F 9AP.

The Licensing Officer provided an outline of the application to the Sub-Committee.

Mr Thomas, representing the Applicant, informed the Sub-Committee that the Premises was previously licensed but this had lapsed due to the death of the Premises owner. Subsequently no application to reinstate the licence within the required twenty-eight-day period had been made. Following a period of closure, a new operator had now taken over the Premises and was seeking a premises licence on terms slightly less then what was permitted previously. Mr Thomas suggested that where a licence had lapsed the City Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy (“SLP”) generally granted new applications on terms which were similar. The provision of recorded music had been withdrawn from the application and twenty-three model conditions, including a works condition, were proposed.

Mr Thomas noted concerns raised over the garden area however the conditions proposed would ensure this area would not be used for regulated entertainment including music. It was the intention for the garden area to operate as it had done previously and for which no complaints had been received. The Sub-Committee was informed that historically there was seating located outside the Premises and this was included in the plans detailing the licensable area. New applications usually excluded external areas from the licensable area but as this application was based on an historic licence it was appropriate to include this area in the application.

In response to a question from the Sub-Committee Mr Thomas confirmed that any music played at the Premises would be of a background nature with no music played in the garden area.

Mr Koduah, representing Environmental Health (EH), confirmed the Premises was located in the West End Cumulative Impact Area (CIA). The previous licence had lapsed but whilst it had operated no complaints had been received. It was considered though that the conditions on the previous licence were considered insufficient to promote all four licencing objectives. EH had therefore proposed conditions to be added to the licence which included requiring the use  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3.

Unit 1, Development Site at 111-119 Charing Cross Road, 1-12 Manette Street, 1-4 Wedgwood Mews and 12-14 Greek Street (“The Premises”)

17/09329/LIPST

1.

Late Night Refreshment - Indoors

Monday to Saturday: 23:00 to 01:00

Sunday: 23:00 to 23:30

Seasonal Variations/Non-Standard Timings:

These hours to be extended from the end of permitted hours on New Year’s Eve to the start of permitted hours of New Year’s Day.

Amendments to application advised at hearing:

None.

Decision (including reasons if different from those set out in report):

The Sub-Committee considered an application by Soho Estates Ltd for a provisional statement for a new premises licence in respect of Unit 1, Development Site at 111-119 Charing Cross Road, 1-12 Manette Street, 1-4 Wedgwood Mews and 12-14 Greek Street.

The Licensing Officer provided an outline of the application to the Sub-Committee.

Councillor Louise Hyams declared that she worked part-time for a planning consultancy which had been involved in the planning application for the scheme but she had had no involvement, or held any discussions, with regards to the application before the Sub-Committee. As a result of the above declaration made by the Councillor the Sub-Committee felt that it was able to approach the application free from bias and with an open mind and so determined the same on its individual merits.

Mr Thomas, representing the Applicant, confirmed that the proposed off sales of alcohol had been withdrawn from the application along with all conditions relating to it. One resident had submitted a representation and this was in favour of the application with no residents objecting to the proposals. Mr Thomas acknowledged that the hours requested were beyond core hours however this was a purpose built development which would be unique in assisting in the dispersal of customers. The Council’s model restaurant condition would be attached onto the licence ensuring it would not become a drink-led premises. It was recognised by the City Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy (“SLP”) that restaurants were less likely than bars or pubs to add to cumulative impact or create public disturbance in the local area.

Mr Nick Lawson, of Soho Estates, explained how the property had been purchased in 2012 with planning permission for the development granted in 2016. It was stated that the proposals for the scheme had been developed over four years taking into account the nearby Crossrail development. It was submitted that the premises would act as a venue where people could dwell and help ensure they  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4.

Unit 2, Development Site at 111-119 Charing Cross Road, 1-12 Manette Street, 1-4 Wedgwood Mews and 12-14 Greek Street (“The Premises”)

17/09330/LIPST

1.

Late Night Refreshment - Indoors

Monday to Saturday: 23:00 to 01:00

Sunday: 23:00 to 23:30

Seasonal Variations/Non-Standard Timings:

These hours to be extended from the end of permitted hours on New Year’s Eve to the start of permitted hours of New Year’s Day.

Amendments to application advised at hearing:

None.

Decision (including reasons if different from those set out in report):

The Sub-Committee considered an application by Soho Estates Ltd for a provisional statement for a new premises licence in respect of Unit 2, Development Site at 111-119 Charing Cross Road, 1-12 Manette Street, 1-4 Wedgwood Mews and 12-14 Greek Street.

The Licensing Officer provided an outline of the application to the Sub-Committee.

Councillor Louise Hyams declared that she worked part-time for a planning consultancy which had been involved in the planning application for the scheme but she had had no involvement, or held any discussions, with regards to the application before the Sub-Committee. As a result of the above declaration made by the Councillor the Sub-Committee felt that it was able to approach the application free from bias and with an open mind and so determined the same on its individual merits.

Mr Thomas, representing the Applicant, confirmed that the proposed off sales of alcohol had been withdrawn from the application along with all conditions relating to it. One resident had submitted a representation and this was in favour of the application with no residents objecting to the proposals. Mr Thomas acknowledged that the hours requested were beyond core hours however this was a purpose built development which would be unique in assisting in the dispersal of customers. The Council’s model restaurant condition would be attached onto the licence ensuring it would not become a drink-led premises. It was recognised by the City Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy (“SLP”) that restaurants were less likely than bars or pubs to add to cumulative impact or create public disturbance in the local area.

Mr Nick Lawson, of Soho Estates, explained how the property had been purchased in 2012 with planning permission for the development granted in 2016. It was stated that the proposals for the scheme had been developed over four years taking into account the nearby Crossrail development. It was submitted that the Premises would act as a venue where people could dwell and help ensure they  ...  view the full minutes text for item 5.

Unit 3, Development Site at 111-119 Charing Cross Road, 1-12 Manette Street, 1-4 Wedgwood Mews and 12-14 Greek Street (“The Premises”)

17/09312/LIPST

1.

Late Night Refreshment - Indoors

Monday to Saturday: 23:00 to 01:00

Sunday: 23:00 to 23:30

Seasonal Variations/Non-Standard Timings:

These hours to be extended from the end of permitted hours on New Year’s Eve to the start of permitted hours of New Year’s Day.

Amendments to application advised at hearing:

None.

Decision (including reasons if different from those set out in report):

The Sub-Committee considered an application by Soho Estates Ltd for a provisional statement for a new premises licence in respect of Unit 3, Development Site at 111-119 Charing Cross Road, 1-12 Manette Street, 1-4 Wedgwood Mews and 12-14 Greek Street.

The Licensing Officer provided an outline of the application to the Sub-Committee.

Councillor Louise Hyams declared that she worked part-time for a planning consultancy which had been involved in the planning application for the scheme but she had had no involvement, or held any discussions, with regards to the application before the Sub-Committee. As a result of the above declaration made by the Councillor the Sub-Committee felt that it was able to approach the application free from bias and with an open mind and so determined the same on its individual merits.

Mr Thomas, representing the Applicant, confirmed that the proposed off sales of alcohol had been withdrawn from the application along with all conditions relating to it. One resident had submitted a representation and this was in favour of the application with no residents objecting to the proposals. Mr Thomas acknowledged that the hours requested were beyond core hours however this was a purpose built development which would be unique in assisting in the dispersal of customers. The Council’s model restaurant condition would be attached onto the licence ensuring it would not become a drink-led premises. It was recognised by the City Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy (“SLP”) that restaurants were less likely than bars or pubs to add to cumulative impact or create public disturbance in the local area.

Mr Nick Lawson, of Soho Estates, explained how the property had been purchased in 2012 with planning permission for the development granted in 2016. It was stated that the proposals for the scheme had been developed over four years taking into account the nearby Crossrail development. It was submitted that the Premises would act as a venue where people could dwell and help ensure they  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6.

Unit 4, Development Site at 111-119 Charing Cross Road, 1-12 Manette Street, 1-4 Wedgwood Mews and 12-14 Greek Street (“The Premises”)

17/09323/LIPST

1.

Late Night Refreshment - Indoors

Monday to Saturday: 23:00 to 01:00

Sunday: 23:00 to 23:30

Seasonal Variations/Non-Standard Timings:

These hours to be extended from the end of permitted hours on New Year’s Eve to the start of permitted hours of New Year’s Day.

Amendments to application advised at hearing:

None.

Decision (including reasons if different from those set out in report):

The Sub-Committee considered an application by Soho Estates Ltd for a provisional statement for a new premises licence in respect of Unit 4, Development Site at 111-119 Charing Cross Road, 1-12 Manette Street, 1-4 Wedgwood Mews and 12-14 Greek Street.

The Licensing Officer provided an outline of the application to the Sub-Committee.

Councillor Louise Hyams declared that she worked part-time for a planning consultancy which had been involved in the planning application for the scheme but she had had no involvement, or held any discussions, with regards to the application before the Sub-Committee. As a result of the above declaration made by the Councillor the Sub-Committee felt that it was able to approach the application free from bias and with an open mind and so determined the same on its individual merits.

Mr Thomas, representing the Applicant, confirmed that the proposed off sales of alcohol had been withdrawn from the application along with all conditions relating to it. One resident had submitted a representation and this was in favour of the application with no residents objecting to the proposals. Mr Thomas acknowledged that the hours requested were beyond core hours however this was a purpose built development which would be unique in assisting in the dispersal of customers. The Council’s model restaurant condition would be attached onto the licence ensuring it would not become a drink-led premises. It was recognised by the City Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy (“SLP”) that restaurants were less likely than bars or pubs to add to cumulative impact or create public disturbance in the local area.

Mr Nick Lawson, of Soho Estates, explained how the property had been purchased in 2012 with planning permission for the development granted in 2016. It was stated that the proposals for the scheme had been developed over four years taking into account the nearby Crossrail development. It was submitted that the premises would act as a venue where people could dwell and help ensure they  ...  view the full minutes text for item 7.

Reign, 215-217 Piccadilly, London, W1J 9HF (“The Premises”)

17/11071/LITENP (Temporary Event Notice)

Proposal:

• The sale by retail of alcohol;
• Provision of Regulated Entertainment; and
• Late Night Refreshment.

Event Period:     

• 00:00 on 21 October 2017 until 04:00 on 21 October 2017; and
• 21:00 on 21 October 2017 until 04:00 on 22 October 2017.

Decision:

The Sub-Committee considered an application for a Temporary Event Notice in respect of Reign, 215-217 Piccadilly, London, W1J 9HF.

The Licensing Officer provided an outline of the application to the Sub-Committee.

In response to a question from the Sub-Committee the applicant confirmed that the sole effect of the notice was to permit a last entry time of 01:30 instead of 00:30.

Mr Kolvin, representing the applicant, suggested that since the Premises had been operated by the current owners the Police appeared to be satisfied with the style of operation currently in place. No complaints had been submitted to Environmental Health (EH) and the Police had not been notified of any issues arising from the Premises in relation to crime and disorder. There had only been one incident and this related to an issue which had subsequently been detected with the ID scanners. The issue with the machine was one that had also subsequently been detected on other scanners located at different venues. The Sub-Committee was advised that the Premises was highly serviced with thirty-eight staff on site during operating hours. The incident in question related to a customer who had been in the Premises for approximately one hour and when he displayed signs of intoxication safety procedures were followed. The customer was assessed, his friends were summoned following which he walked out of the Premises and continued further down the street where he then subsequently collapsed to the floor. The Premises staff were unaware of the incident until the customer’s parents contacted them explaining that he was underage and had gained entry to the Premises using a fake ID. The applicant contacted the ID scanner provider immediately to ascertain any issues with the machines and straightaway implemented extra ID checking processes. Discussions with the Police had taken place and Mr Kolvin suggested that they were content that the applicant had done everything possible to ensure such a situation did not happen again. Mr Kolvin confirmed that the application was not seeking to change the capacity of the Premises.

In response to a question from the Sub-Committee Mr Kolvin explained that the fault detected with the ID scanner had been found on other machines at different premises. Discussions with the supplier were  ...  view the full minutes text for item 8.

Reign, 215-217 Piccadilly, London, W1J 9HF (“The Premises”)

17/11073/LITENP (Temporary Event Notice)

Proposal:

• The sale by retail of alcohol;
• Provision of Regulated Entertainment; and
• Late Night Refreshment.

Event Period:     

• 00:00 on 28 October 2017 until 04:00 on 28 October 2017; and
• 21:00 on 28 October 2017 until 04:00 on 29 October 2017.

Decision:

The Sub-Committee considered an application for a Temporary Event Notice in respect of Reign, 215-217 Piccadilly, London, W1J 9HF.

The Licensing Officer provided an outline of the application to the Sub-Committee.

In response to a question from the Sub-Committee the applicant confirmed that the sole effect of the notice was to permit a last entry time of 01:30 instead of 00:30.

Mr Kolvin, representing the applicant, suggested that since the Premises had been operated by the current owners the Police appeared to be satisfied with the style of operation currently in place. No complaints had been submitted to Environmental Health (EH) and the Police had not been notified of any issues arising from the Premises in relation to crime and disorder. There had only been one incident and this related to an issue which had subsequently been detected with the ID scanners. The issue with the machine was one that had also subsequently been detected on other scanners located at different venues. The Sub-Committee was advised that the Premises was highly serviced with thirty-eight staff on site during operating hours. The incident in question related to a customer who had been in the Premises for approximately one hour and when he displayed signs of intoxication safety procedures were followed. The customer was assessed, his friends were summoned following which he walked out of the Premises and continued further down the street where he then subsequently collapsed to the floor. The Premises staff were unaware of the incident until the customer’s parents contacted them explaining that he was underage and had gained entry to the Premises using a fake ID. The applicant contacted the ID scanner provider immediately to ascertain any issues with the machines and straightaway implemented extra ID checking processes. Discussions with the Police had taken place and Mr Kolvin suggested that they were content that the applicant had done everything possible to ensure such a situation did not happen again. Mr Kolvin confirmed that the application was not seeking to change the capacity of the Premises.

In response to a question from the Sub-Committee Mr Kolvin explained that the fault detected with the ID scanner had been found on other machines at different premises. Discussions with the supplier were  ...  view the full minutes text for item 9.