Venue: Rooms 5, 6 & 7 - 17th Floor, Westminster City Hall, 64 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6 QP. View directions
Contact: Jonathan Deacon
Email: jdeacon@westminster.gov.uk Tel: 020 7641 2783
Items
| No. |
Item |
1. |
Membership
To report any changes to the membership.
Minutes:
There were no changes to the
Membership.
|
2. |
Declarations of Interest
To receive declarations by
Members and Officers of any personal or prejudicial interests in
matters on this agenda.
Minutes:
Councillor Peter Freeman declared in respect of item 2 on the
agenda (The Marylebone Tup,
93 Marylebone High Street, W1), that he knew the
premises and had visited it on a few occasions. However, he did not
view this as a personal or prejudicial interest and remained
present to consider the matter.
|
1. |
Italian Cafe / Deli, Unit 5, Bishop's Quarters, Bishop's Bridge Road, W2  PDF 1 MB
|
App
No
|
Ward/ Cumulative
Impact Area
|
Site Name and
Address
|
Application
|
Licensing Reference
Number
|
|
1.
|
Bayswater Ward /
Queensway & Bayswater Cumulative Impact Area
|
Italian Cafe / Deli,
Unit 5, Bishop's Quarters, Bishop's Bridge Road, W2
|
New
|
15/11914/LIPN
|
Minutes:
LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE No. 2
Thursday
11th February 2016
Membership:
Councillor Nickie Aiken (Chairman), Councillor Nick Evans and
Councillor Peter Freeman
Legal
Adviser:
Barry Panto
Committee Officer: Toby
Howes
|
Café / Deli, Unit 5, Bishop’s Quarters,
Bishop’s Bridge Road W2
15/119114/LIPN
|
|
Application adjourned prior to the hearing.
|
|
2. |
The Marylebone Tup, 93 Marylebone High Street, W1 PDF 3 MB
|
App
No
|
Ward/ Cumulative
Impact Area
|
Site Name and
Address
|
Application
|
Licensing Reference
Number
|
|
2.
|
Marylebone High Street
Ward / not in cumulative impact area
|
The Marylebone
Tup, 93 Marylebone High Street,
W1
|
New
|
15/11508/LIPN
|
Minutes:
LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE No. 2
Thursday
11th February 2016
Membership:
Councillor Nickie Aiken (Chairman), Councillor Nick Evans and
Councillor Peter Freeman.
Legal
Adviser:
Barry Panto
Committee Officer: Toby
Howes
Presenting Officer:
Sumeet K Anand-Patel
Relevant Representations: Environmental Health and a
local resident.
Present: Ms Felicity Tulloch (Legal
Representative for the Applicant Company), Mr Ben Avigdori (Director, Applicant Company) and Anil
Drayan (Environmental Health).
Declarations: Councillor Peter Freeman declared that he knew the
premises and had visited it on a few occasions. However, he did not
view this as a personal or prejudicial interest and remained
present to consider the matter.
|
The
Marylebone Tup, 93 Marylebone High
Street, W1
15/11508/LIPN
|
|
1.
|
Regulated Entertainment: Exhibition of a Film, Indoor Sporting
Events, Live Music and Recorded Music
|
|
|
Monday to Thursday: 09:00 to
23:30
Friday and Saturday: 09:00 to
00:00
Sunday: 09:00 to
22:30
|
|
|
From the end of permitted hours
on New Year’s Eve to the start of permitted hours on New
Year’s Day.
|
|
|
Amendments to application advised at hearing:
None.
|
|
|
Decision (including reasons if
different from those set out in report):
Ms Tulloch, the Applicant
Company’s Legal Representative, began by advising that
the Applicant Company had acquired the
premises in 2011 and there was already a premises licence in place
on the ground floor. However, the Applicant Company had submitted
an application for a new premises licence in order that part of the
first floor would also be licensed in addition to the ground floor.
There would also be other works undertaken if the licence was
granted, including additional fire exits. Ms Tulloch stated that
the hours sought for licensable activities and opening hours were
identical to those on the existing premises licence. She confirmed
that the Applicant Company would surrender its existing premises
licence upon completion of the works if the application was
granted. She stated that the Applicant Company had met with Anil
Drayan from Environmental Health and had agreed to the conditions
that he had proposed.
The Sub-Committee heard that
the Police had also visited the premises and had noted that the
Applicant Company had agreed to the conditions proposed by
Environmental Health and as a consequence, the Police had withdrawn
their representation. Ms Tulloch stated that two letters had been
sent to a resident who had made a representation on the
application, one hand delivered by the Applicant Company on
18th January, and the second by special delivery on
29th January, however no response to the letters had
been received.
Members asked what distance the
resident making the representation lived from the premises and the
length of time the works on the premises would take to
complete.
In reply, Mr
Avigdori, Director at the Applicant
Company, advised that the works were likely to take around 12 weeks
and would involve putting in a new steel structure. He anticipated
that the premises would be closed for a period of 2 to 3 weeks
during the works. Mr Avigdori felt that
the distance between the premises and ...
view the full minutes text for item 2.
|
|