Skip to main content

Decisions

Use the below search options at the bottom of the page to find information regarding recent decisions that have been taken by the council’s decision making bodies.

Alternatively you can visit the officer decisions page for information on officer delegated decisions that have been taken by council officers.

Earlier - Later

Decisions published

01/04/2021 - Leisure Contract Variation ref: 1333    Recommendations Approved

Since the Government introduced emergency laws and ancillary industry guidance in light of the coronavirus pandemic, the contract between the Council and the leisure service contractor have been subject to change in law provisions as set out under the terms of the contract.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Young People, Learning and Leisure

Decision published: 31/03/2021

Effective from: 01/04/2021

Decision:

WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL

 

STATEMENT OF DECISION

 

SUBJECT: 

Leisure Contract Variation

 

Notice is hereby given that Councillor Melvyn Caplan, Member for City Management,has made the following executive decision on the above mentioned subject for the reasons set out below.

 

Since the Government introduced emergency laws and ancillary industry guidance in light of the coronavirus pandemic, the contract between the Council and the leisure service contractor have been subject to change in law provisions as set out under the terms of the contract.)

 

Recommendations

 

The report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of s100A and Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended), in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).

 

The Cabinet Member for City Management approved the contract variation per Appendix B and delegated authority to the Executive Director of Environment and City Management to complete the contractual arrangements.

 

Reasons for Decision

 

It is of key strategic importance to the Council to reach a consensus and agreement with SLM on the contract variation in order to assure continuity of services and enable them to be open to residents in line with Government guidelines. It is also key that the conditions imposed on the Council with respect to its statutory duties, and any applicable grant funding or relief are in turn applied to the contractor and adhered to so as not to compromise relevant funding.

 

This decision has been taken as a matter of urgency and has been approved by the Chairman of the Finance, Smart City and City Management Policy and Scrutiny Committee and the Chief Executive.

 

Stuart Love, Chief Executive,

 

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON 

SW1E 6QP

 

Publication Date:

 

01 April 2021

Implementation Date:

 

01 April 2021

Reference:

CMfE&CM/06/2021

sssssssssssssssssssssss

Wards affected: (All Wards);


18/03/2021 - 10.00 AM: Bellaria Restaurant, 71 Great Titchfield St, London W1W 6RB ref: 1325    Recommendations Approved

Decision Maker: Licensing Sub-Committee (2)

Made at meeting: 18/03/2021 - Licensing Sub-Committee (2)

Decision published: 29/03/2021

Effective from: 18/03/2021

Decision:

 

WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE NO.2

(“The Committee”)

 

Thursday 18 March 2021

          

Membership:           Councillor Tim Mitchell (Chairman), Councillor Richard Elcho and Councillor Maggie Carman

 

 

Officer Support:       Legal Adviser:     Viviene Walker

                                Policy Officer:     Kerry Simpkin

                                Committee Officer:     Cameron Maclean

                                Presenting Officer:     Jessica Donovan

 

 

Parties Present:       Mr Nimet Oner, the Applicant, Ms Ilkay Cinco Oner (representing the Applicant), Mr Richard Brown, Citizens Advice Westminster, Licensing Project (representing residents); Mr Gareth Hughes, Counsel (representing the Langham Court Hotel); Mr Yoram Blumann, representing the Fitzrovia Neighbourhood Association; Mr Christopher Sharp, Mr Austen Callison and Ms Barbara Corr (Objectors). 

                             

Application for a Variation of Premises Licence – Bellaria Restaurant Basement and Ground Floor 71 Great Titchfield Street London W1W 6RB

20/11567/LIPV

 

                                                     FULL DECISION

 

 

Premises

 

Bellaria Restaurant

71 Great Titchfield Street

London W1W 6RB

 

Applicant

 

Mr. Nimet Oner

 

Cumulative Impact Area

 

The Premises are not located within the Cumulative Impact Area

 

Ward

 

West End

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary of Application

 

The Sub-Committee has determined an application for a variation of a premises licence under the Licensing Act 2003 (“the Act”).  The Premises are a restaurant situated in the West End Ward, but not within the Cumulative Impact Area or the Special Consideration Zone. 

 

 

Proposed Licensable Activities and Hours

 

Hours the Premises are open to the Public

 

Monday to Wednesday 10:00 to 23:30 hours

Thursday to Saturday 10:00 to 00:30 hours

Sunday 12:00 to 23:00 hours.

 

 Live Music operation

 

Thursday to Saturday 10:00 to 00:30 hours.

 

Recorded Music

 

Monday to Wednesday 10:00 to 23:30 hours

Thursday to Saturday 10:00 to 00:30 hours

Sunday 12:00 to 23:00 hours.

 

Late Night Refreshment

 

Monday to Wednesday 23:00 to 23:30 hours.

Thursday to Saturday 23:00 to 00:30 hours.

 

Sale by Retail of Alcohol (On Sales)

 

Monday to Wednesday 10:00 to 23:00 hours.

Thursday to Saturday 10:00 to 00:30 hours.  

Sunday 12:00 to 22:30 hours.

 

 

Representations Received

 

·       Environmental Health Service (Dave Nevitt)

·       Metropolitan Police Service (Nicole Sondh) (Withdrawn)

·       25 Local Residents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary of issues raised by Objectors

 

 

·       The proposals are likely to increase the risk of Public Nuisance.  The extended licensable activities sought are significantly beyond the Core Hours.

 

·       I object to the application to extend opening hours to 1:30 a.m. on Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays for late night refreshment and sale of alcohol, and until 11.30 p.m. on Sunday for the sale of alcohol. The proposal to extend the hours when music played is also problematic. This would represent a very significant increase on the hours currently allowed.   It will undermine licensing objectives to prevent public nuisance. The restaurant has I understand already received multiple noise complaints from residents about loud music emanating from the premises. It should be noted these complaints have been made within current licensing arrangements, which ensure the premises close at a reasonable time. It can, therefore, be assumed that these issues would continue were the premises allowed to open until 1:30 a.m. only this time they would cause more nuisance as the restaurant would clearly continue much later into the night. In addition, it would create a precedent, paving the way for further public nuisance issues, again contrary to the licensing objectives. 

 

·       These kinds of late-night licensing applications are not appropriate for a highly residential area.   The applicant does not propose specific measures to attenuate the noise and vibration caused by these activities, it does not propose limiters on volume and noise and bass, it does not mention sound systems or volumes, or how this is to be controlled, it does not propose to fit soundproofing; it does not show where within the premises this activity would take place and how many people would be allowed to dance on the floor. 

 

·       There are no measures to prevent noise escaping through the doors; currently, there are no double doors, and the door remains open most of the time, causing noise to escape to the street.  There is no proposal to control and minimise the number of people going out for a smoke.  It is right to support hospitality businesses during a moment like the one we're living through. However, it's important to strike a balance between protecting residential amenity and supporting businesses, which this application would fail to do. Furthermore, the licensing objectives must be maintained.

 

·       The restaurant is located at the heart of a residential area; we have major concerns over the potential loss of amenity to residents, in particular good night sleep caused by the nuisance from the premises. There is a past record of complaints from residents regarding issues of public nuisance. The proposed conditions and measures by the applicant are inadequate and fail to address the concerns raised above. Given the residential character of the area, the potential of nuisance caused by the premises into 0130 and beyond, would prevent residents from going to sleep before 0200, this is unacceptable.  Noises from the premises, the coming and going to and from the premises, cars, taxis minicabs, uber services, engine cars revving or being kept running while the vehicle is waiting for patrons to emerge, the dispersal of customers leaving the premises and the noise made by bringing chairs and tables inside. 

 

·       This is an area with a high number of residents.  All the buildings close to the specific location of the restaurant contain flats - other than the immediate neighbour on Langham Street, and that is a hotel. I believe that all these people could be badly affected by the extension of the opening hours late into the night and the additional disturbance that would be caused. I would certainly be impacted by the additional disturbance late at night because I live on Langham Street and my bedroom is directly opposite the restaurant.  The potential disturbances are not only from the immediate noise of the diners and the entertainment proposed but the noise caused by their departure and the closing up of the restaurant.

 

·       I am sympathetic to the need of our local restaurants to make a living. They make a valuable contribution to the vitality and liveliness of our area and I am keen that they should prosper, but this must not be at the expense of the ability of the local residents to get a good night's sleep. The local residents also make a valuable contribution to the atmosphere of the area and they should have their interests protected too.  I believe an extension to opening hours would set a very bad precedent and open up the possibility of other restaurants in the area also seeking to extend their hours. The level of noise and disturbance could very rapidly become intolerable. I strongly believe there is a need for all the hospitality businesses in the area to close by 11pm at the latest.  For these reasons I wish to object strongly to any extension of opening hours for this restaurant and ask you to reject this licensing application.

 

 

 

Policy Considerations

 

Policies HRS1, RTN1 and PB1 apply under the City Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy.  Applications outside the West End Cumulative Zone will generally be granted subject to the application meeting the requirements of Policies CD1, PS1, PN1 and CH1.

 

 

                                           SUBMISSIONS AND REASONS

 

 

The Presenting Officer, Ms Donovan summarised the application to the Sub-Committee.  She confirmed that during the consultation process, the Applicant had withdrawn the application for the “Performance of Dance”.

 

Ms Donovan stated that representations had been received from the Metropolitan Police Service, but these had subsequently been withdrawn following agreement with the Applicant on proposed conditions to be attached to the Premises Licence.

 

Mr. David Nevitt on behalf of Environmental Health Services (EHS) stated that EHS had maintained its representation as there were several objections from residents and because the application was beyond the Council’s policy on Core Hours.

 

Mr. Nevitt stated that there was no history of noise complaints from these premises which had been operating for quite a long time as a restaurant.  He went on to say, on checking the Council’s records for noise complaints relating to these premises, there had been a complaint in 2017, about the use of speakers outside the premises which had resulted in Council Officers visiting the premises.  On that occasion, it was not held that the speakers constituted a nuisance.

 

Mr. Richard Brown, from the CAB Licensing Project, on behalf of Residents stated that it was apparent from the representations made by residents that there was a lot of goodwill towards the restaurant and residents wished the restaurant success when it reopened.  However, he stated that it was not accurate to say there had been no noise complaints from the premises.  Mr Brown then referred to specific complaints set out in the representations.

 

Mr. Brown proposed that, should the application be granted, this would exacerbate existing concerns about noise nuisance which might otherwise be managed within the existing licence conditions.

 

Mr. Brown stated that residents were opposed to the application to allow live music until midnight, noting there was no acoustic lobby at the entrance to the premises, and no proposals to install a sound limiter.  Mr. Brown referred to Paragraph E8 of the Core Hours Policy (HRS1) in the Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy which emphasised the link between a late terminal hour and dispersal, Policy PN1, Prevention of Public Nuisance and the application of that policy in accordance with the criteria and consideration set out in the Statement of Licensing Policy.

 

Mr. Gareth Hughes on behalf of the Langham Court Hotel which was immediately adjacent to the premises stated that there was too little evidence in the application to support the late hours sought by the Applicant.  Therefore, the application must fail.

He stated that there was nothing in the application to say how the Applicant would promote the licensing objective of Prevention of Public Nuisance or measures to ameliorate possible noise nuisance, particularly, given there was a party wall between the premises and the Langham Court Hotel next door.

 

Ms. Ilkay Cinco Oner on behalf of the Applicant, stated that she was the leaseholder of the Premises which were managed by Mr Oner.  She stated that having reviewed the objections to the application, it had been decided to withdraw the application for “Performance of Dance” and to prepare a response to the queries raised by neighbours.

 

Ms Oner stated that the Applicant did not wish to cause any nuisance or disruption to the neighbours.  She stated that it was a very small restaurant accommodating 28 people upstairs and 30 people downstairs.  She stated that, regarding the dispersal of patrons and management of the smoking area, the Applicant was willing to consider any proposals that might be put forward by residents.  In addition, a member of staff would be employed to manage the door and ensure there was no disturbance as patrons left the Premises.

 

Ms. Oner noted that concerns had been expressed about the premises becoming a bar.  She emphasised that the Premises would not become a bar.  She stated that there would be no vertical drinking and the sale of alcohol would be ancillary to a meal and would be by table service only.

 

In conclusion, Ms Oner stated that the Applicant was willing to discuss any concerns anyone might have about the application, noting that the Applicant had accepted the conditions proposed by the Police.

 

In response to Members’ questions, Ms Oner and Mr Oner provided the following information:

 

·       The music proposed for the basement area would be background music or a     person playing a saxophone or a guitar.  There would not be hard-core drum and bass and/or a resident DJ.

·       The Applicant had never received any noise abatement notice or other documentation relating to noise complaints.

·       For evening booking, often the menu would have been agreed in advance and would consist of 3 to 4 courses with an expectation that the group would stay for 2 to 3 hours.

·       The proposed door staff would be SIA registered door supervisors who would be employed on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday evenings.

 

The Chairman of the Committee referred to the licence conditions proposed by the Responsible Authorities and Ms Oner confirmed that the Applicant had agreed to these conditions.  In addition, Ms Oner stated that the Applicant would be willing to reduce the hours for the opening of the Premises to the public, on Thursday to Saturday from 01:30 to 01:00 hours.

 

Conclusion

 

The Sub-Committee realises that it has a duty to consider each application on its individual merits.  It welcomed that fact that the Applicant had engaged with the Responsible Authorities.  The Sub-Committee were mindful of the fact that conditions had been agreed with the Responsible Authorities.

 

The Sub-Committee took comfort from the fact that the Police had withdrawn their objection.  This demonstrated to the Sub-Committee that the Police were satisfied with the application when it came to crime and disorder and that the conditions, they sought in relation to a SIA Door Supervisor Staff from 22:00 hours Thursdays to Saturdays was to be imposed on the Premises Licence having the desired effect of upholding the crime and disorder licensing objective.

 

The Sub-Committee noted that after discussions with the Environmental Health Service the Applicant had agreed to amend the application to reduce the hours that the Premises would be open to the public Thursdays to Saturdays as set out in the application.

 

The Sub-Committee also noted that live and recorded music were played in the basement area of the Premises, and during the time the Applicant had operated these Premises, this had not given rise to any noise complaints from residents or the adjoining Langham Court Hotel.   The Sub-Committee concluded that the lack of previous complaints alongside the Environmental Health Service conditions would alleviate residents’ concerns.

 

The Sub-Committee considered that the conditions it has imposed on the Premises Licence were appropriate and proportionate to promote the licensing objectives.  Accordingly, the Sub-Committee decided that the Applicant had provided valid reasons as to why the granting of the application would promote the licensing objectives. 

 

Having carefully considered the committee papers and the submissions made by all parties both orally and in writing, the Sub-Committee decided, after taking into account all the circumstances of this application and the promotion of the licensing objectives to grant the application with the following permissions:

 

  1. To grant permission to extend the hours the premises are open to the public, Monday to Wednesday 10:00 to 23:30; Thursday to Saturday 10:00 to 00:30 hours; Sunday 12:00 to 23:00.

 

  1. To grant permission to add Live Music operation Thursday to Saturday 10:00 to 00:30 hours.

 

  1. To grant permission to change and extend the hours of Recorded Music, Monday to Wednesday 10:00 to 23:30; Thursday to Saturday 10:00 to 00:30 hours; Sunday 12:00 to 23:00.

 

  1. To grant permission to change and extend the hours of Late-Night Refreshment, Monday to Wednesday 23:00 to 23:30; Thursday to Saturday 23:00 to 00:30 hours.

 

  1. To grant permission to change and extend the Sale of Alcohol on the Premises, Monday to Wednesday 10:00 to 23:00; Thursday to Saturday 10:00 to 00:30 hours; Sunday 12:00 to 22:30.

 

6.     That the Licence is subject to any relevant mandatory conditions.

 

  1. That the Licence is subject to the following additional conditions imposed by the Committee which are considered appropriate and proportionate to promote the licensing objectives.

 

 

Conditions imposed by the Committee after a hearing

 

8.       The premises shall install and maintain a comprehensive CCTV system as

     per the minimum requirements of the Westminster Police Licensing Team. All

     entry and exit points will be covered enabling frontal identification of every

     person entering in any light condition. The CCTV system shall continually

     record whilst the premises are open for licensable activities and during all

     times when customers remain on the premises. All recordings shall be stored

     for a minimum period of 31 days with date and time stamping. Viewing of

     recordings shall be made available immediately upon the request of Police or

     authorised officer throughout the entire 31day period.

 

9.        A staff member from the premises who is conversant with the operation of

           the CCTV system shall be on the premises at all times when the premises   

           are open. This staff member must be able to provide the Police or authorised

           council officer copies of recent CCTV images or data with the absolute

           minimum of delay when requested.

 

10.      A Challenge 21 or Challenge 25 proof of age scheme shall be operated at  

           the premises where the only acceptable forms of identification are

           recognised photographic identification cards, such as a driving licence,

           passport or proof of age card with the PASS Hologram.

 

11.      An incident log shall be kept at the premises and made available on request to an authorised officer of the City Council or the Police. It must be completed within 24 hours of the incident and will record the following: 

(a) all crimes reported to the venue 

(b) all ejections of patrons

(c) any complaints received concerning crime and disorder 

(d) any incidents of disorder

           (e) all seizures of drugs or offensive weapons 

(f) any faults in the CCTV system, searching equipment or scanning equipment 

(g) any refusal of the sale of alcohol 

(h) any visit by a relevant authority or emergency service

 

12.      On Thursday, Friday and Saturday after 23:00 hours until 00:30 hours the following day. The premises shall only operate as a restaurant 

(i) in which customers are shown to their table,

(ii) where the supply of alcohol is by waiter or waitress service only,

(iii) which provide food in the form of substantial table meals that are prepared on the premises and are served and consumed at the table using non disposable crockery, 

(iv) which do not provide any takeaway service of food or drink for immediate consumption,

(v) which do not provide any takeaway service of food or drink after 23.00, and 

(vi) where alcohol shall not be sold or supplied, otherwise than for consumption by persons who are seated in the premises and bona fide taking substantial table meals there and provided always that the consumption of alcohol by such persons is ancillary to taking such meals. 

 

13.      All outside tables and chairs shall be rendered unusable by 23:00 hours each day.

 

14.      On Thursday, Friday and Saturday, entry to the venue after 21:00 hours will be by prior reservation only and the last entry will be at 23:00 hours.

 

15.      All windows and external doors shall be kept closed at any time when regulated entertainment takes place, except for the immediate access and egress of persons. 

 

16.      On Thursday, Friday and Saturday, a minimum of one (1) SIA licensed door supervisor shall be on duty at the premises from 21:00 hours until 30 minutes after licensing hours.

 

17.      Live entertainment shall cease at midnight.

 

18.      Save for in any permitted external area, patrons permitted to temporarily leave and then re-enter the premises, e.g., to smoke, shall not be permitted to take drinks or glass containers with them.

 

19.      The premises licence holder shall ensure that any patrons drinking and/or smoking outside the premises do so in an orderly manner and are supervised by staff so as to ensure that there is no public nuisance or obstruction of the public highway.

 

20.      Notices shall be prominently displayed at any area used for smoking requesting patrons to respect the needs of local residents and use the area quietly.

 

21.      Notices shall be prominently displayed at all exits requesting patrons to respect the needs of local residents and businesses and leave the area quietly.

 

22.      Regulated Entertainment (live music/recorded music after 23:00 hours) will only take place in the Basement.

 

23.      There will be a designated smoking area and the number of smokers permitted at any one time will be limited to 6 persons.

 

24.      There shall be no sales of hot food or hot drink for consumption off the premises after 23:00 hours.

 

25.      All waste shall be properly presented and placed out for collection no earlier than 30 minutes before the scheduled collection times.

 

26.      No deliveries to the premises shall take place between (23:00) and (08:00) on the following day.

 

 

This is the Full Decision reached by the Licensing Sub-Committee.

 

This Decision takes immediate effect.

 

Wards affected: West End;


18/03/2021 - Approval of Expenditure from the Ward Budget of Hyde Park ref: 1321    Recommendations Approved

Decision Maker: Leader of the Council

Decision published: 18/03/2021

Effective from: 18/03/2021

Decision:

Summary of Decision

 

That the expenditure of £10,566.54 in order to commission Capital funding to carry out essential electrical works at St John’s Church in Hyde Park be approved.

 

Reasons for Decision

 

The proposals in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement.

 

 

 

Stuart Love, Chief Executive,

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON SW1E 6QP

 

Publication Date:

 

18 March 2021

Implementation Date:

 

18 March 2021

Reference:

 

CMfLA/3/2020-2021

 

Wards affected: Hyde Park;

Lead officer: Janis Best


25/11/2020 - ANY OTHER BUSINESS WHICH THE CHAIR CONSIDERS URGENT ref: 1292    Recommendations Approved

Decision Maker: Licensing Committee

Made at meeting: 25/11/2020 - Licensing Committee

Decision published: 05/01/2021

Effective from: 25/11/2020

Decision:

7.1       There was no other business raised by the Committee.

 


31/12/2020 - Discretionary Housing Payment Review Advisory Panel: (24.11.20) Determination of Discretionary Housing Payment Review Applications ref: 1290    Recommendations Approved

Cabinet Member approval sought.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration

Decision published: 31/12/2020

Effective from: 31/12/2020

Decision:

1.         That Appendix A to this report be exempt from public disclosure by virtue of paragraph 7 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 because the applications involve the likely disclosure of exempt information relating to an individual.

           

2.         That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the recommendations of the Discretionary Housing Payment Review Advisory Panel meeting held on 24 November 2020.

 

Reasons for Decision 

The Discretionary Housing Payment Review Advisory Panel has set out the reasons for the recommendations in each case considered by the Panel in the recommendations as set out in Appendix A of the report, which are more fully set out in the case papers submitted to the Panel.


31/12/2020 - Rating Advisory Panel 08/12/2020 ref: 1291    Recommendations Approved

Determination of NNDR Discretionary and Hardship Relief Applications

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration

Decision published: 31/12/2020

Effective from: 31/12/2020

Decision:

1.              That this report and appendices be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972 Schedule 12A, Part 1, Paragraph 3, as amended, in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of an individual.

 

2.       That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the recommendations of the Rating Advisory Panel held on 8th December 2020 and determined the applications for National Non-Domestic Rates Discretionary and Hardship relief as set out in Appendix A of the report.

Reasons for Decision

 

The Rating Advisory Panel has set out the reasons for the recommendations in each case considered by the Panel in the recommendations in Appendix A of the report.

Wards affected: (All Wards);

Lead officer: Gemma Williams


31/12/2020 - PiP Funding ref: 1289    Recommendations Approved

To review and agree on-going budget requirements for the Partners in Practice programme which funds the Clinical Practice team in Children's services.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration

Decision published: 31/12/2020

Effective from: 09/01/2021

Decision:

That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration agreed a budget growth of £0.578m as a means of bridging the gap in funding that will otherwise arise because of the cessation of the Partners in Practice (PiP) programme and noted that this will enable the crucial work being undertaken by the Clinical Practice team to continue in 2020/21 and beyond.

 

Reasons for Decision 

 

1.              The Clinical Practice Team received funding from the Partners in Practice (PiP) programme between 2016/17 and 2019/20.  The team has been pivotal in keeping Looked After Children (LAC) and Child Protection numbers at a significantly lower rate than the national average. 

 

2.              The annual cost of the team is £0.578m, however costs avoided because of lower than average LAC numbers and Child Protection orders when compared to the national average are estimated at £5.700m.

Wards affected: (All Wards);

Lead officer: Rikin Tailor


21/12/2020 - NWEC Property & Occupier BIDs Renewal Ballots ref: 1288    Recommendations Approved

New West End Company Property & Occupier BIDs Renewal Ballots

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Business and Planning

Decision published: 21/12/2020

Effective from: 21/12/2020

Decision:

Summary of Decision

 

  1. That the NWEC’s Occupier and Property Owner BIDs’ Renewal & Alteration Proposal be endorsed.

 

  1. That the Chief Executive be requested as the City Council’s Returning Officer and “ballot holder” to hold a ballot for NWEC’s Occupier and Property Owner BIDs’ Renewal & Alteration Proposal be approved.

 

  1. That the Director of Law be authorised on behalf of the City Council to enter into the necessary legal agreements for collection of the BID Levy. In addition, deal with related service specifications for all other connected services which the City Council is required to deliver throughout the BID’s term and any other necessary legal matters in respect of the Whitehall BID Proposal as instructed and in consultation with the appropriate officers.

 

Reasons for Decision 

NWEC has a strong collaborative relationship with the City Council. Notable achievements over the last three years include:

·       Securing ‘International Centre’ policy status for the district in the West End

·       50% fewer buses on Oxford Street & Regent Street

·       £150m Oxford Street improvement plan confirmed in 2019 following a complex cross party working and advocacy campaign

·       £10m Bond Street Scheme completed

·       £2m extra funding raised for the £12m transformation of Hanover Square

·       £18m East Mayfair public realm enhancement programme secured with partners

·       £10m additional non-BID levy raised and re-invested into the area

·       £20m in local business rates relief fund returned in 2018 to West End businesses through our advocacy and facilitated through Westminster City Council

·       Implemented a pilot West End freight and waste consolidation service which reduced number of waste vehicles in East Mayfair by 17.5%

·       £60m district reputation media coverage reaching 250m people locally & globally

 

It is anticipated that NWEC will continue to play an active part in the joint working arrangements Westminster has set up for BIDs to liaise with City Council members and officers, to enable new ideas, plans and initiatives of mutual concern to be discussed prior to public launch. Officers will also continue to encourage NWEC as with all BIDs to work collaboratively with each other on joint initiatives so as to avoid duplication of resources and contact with the City Council.

 

This report describes the Proposal that has been submitted by NWEC to secure a further five-year term for their Occupier and property Owner BIDs. These do not conflict with City Council policies.

 

Stuart Love,

Chief Executive,

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON SW1E 6QP

 

Publication Date:

 

21 December 2020

Implementation Date:

 

21 December 2020

Reference:

 

CMfB&P/12/2020/21

 

Wards affected: Bryanston and Dorset Square; Marylebone; West End;

Lead officer: Haylea Asadi


21/12/2020 - Whitehall BID Ballot ref: 1287    Recommendations Approved

A new BID for Whitehall for a proposed 2 year term which will then merge with Victoria Westminster BID

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Business and Planning

Decision published: 21/12/2020

Effective from: 21/12/2020

Decision:

Summary of Decision

 

  1. That the Whitehall BID Proposal be endorsed.

 

  1. That the Chief Executive be requested as the City Council’s Returning Officer and “ballot holder” to hold a ballot for the Whitehall BID Proposal be approved.

 

  1. That the Director of Law be authorised on behalf of the City Council to enter into the necessary legal agreements for collection of the BID Levy. In addition, deal with related service specifications for all other connected services which the City Council is required to deliver throughout the BID’s term and any other necessary legal matters in respect of the Whitehall BID Proposal as instructed and in consultation with the appropriate officers.

 

Reasons for Decision 

Victoria Westminster BID Ltd has been instrumental in delivering significant changes within the area over the last two years and has contributed to and created meaningful achievements during this time. Examples of these are:

·       Working with the Victoria BID and Westminster City Council to regenerate Christchurch Gardens as a world class urban green space

·       Joining a radio link system connected businesses to local Met Police teams

·       Providing dedicated cleaning teams including night-time cleaning and security teams

·       Daily reporting of issues to the local authority and relevant stakeholders for action

·       Delivering an updated public realm strategy for the area

·       Installing an annual Christmas installation near Parliament Square on Storey’s Gate

·       Circulating thousands of local discount ‘Privilege Cards’

·       Commissioning a Vibrancy Report to help inform strategic decisions

·       Local businesses have donated thousands of Christmas gifts to nominated charities

It is anticipated that as with the other South Westminster BIDs, the proposed Whitehall BID will play an active part in the joint working arrangements the City Council has set up for all BIDs to liaise with City Council members and officers, to enable new ideas, plans and initiatives of mutual concern to be discussed prior to public launch. Officers will also continue to encourage all BIDs to work collaboratively with each other on joint initiatives so as to avoid duplication of resources and contact with the City Council.

 

This report describes the Proposal that has been submitted by Victoria Westminster BID to secure a new BID for Whitehall. These do not conflict with City Council policies.

 

Stuart Love,

Chief Executive,

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON SW1E 6QP

 

Publication Date:

 

21 December 2020

Implementation Date:

 

21 December 2020

Reference:

 

CMfB&P/12/2020/21

 

Wards affected: St James's;

Lead officer: Haylea Asadi


21/12/2020 - Approval of Expenditure from the Ward Budget of Vincent Square ref: 1286    Recommendations Approved

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital

Decision published: 21/12/2020

Effective from: 21/12/2020

Decision:

Summary of Decision

 

That the expenditure of £10,000 to commission Anchor Court Security Works which includes the installation of the following items be approved.

 

• Secure number-locked vehicle gate – off Douglas Street

• Secure number-locked pedestrian gate – off Carey Place, into the car park

• Higher wrought iron fencing – around the car park

• Automatic-opening electronic connections to the building fire safety systems

 

 

Reason for Decision

 

The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement. 

 

 

Stuart Love, Chief Executive,

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON SW1E 6QP

 

Publication Date:

21 December 2020

Implementation Date:

21 December 2020

Reference:

 

CMfCS&D/10/2020/21

 

Wards affected: Vincent Square;

Lead officer: Janis Best


21/12/2020 - Ward Budget for Upperdeckers Programme 2021 ref: 1285    Recommendations Approved

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital

Decision published: 21/12/2020

Effective from: 21/12/2020

Decision:

Summary of Decision

 

That the expenditure of £14,175 to commission the Upperdeckers Programme be approved.

 

Reason for Decision

 

The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement. 

 

 

Stuart Love, Chief Executive,

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON SW1E 6QP

 

Publication Date:

21 December 2020

Implementation Date:

21 December 2020

Reference:

 

CMfCS&D/11/2020/21

 

Wards affected: Churchill; Tachbrook; Warwick;

Lead officer: Janis Best


21/12/2020 - Contract Award for School Age Speech and Language Therapy Services ref: 1284    Recommendations Approved

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Children's Services

Decision published: 21/12/2020

Effective from: 31/12/2020

Decision:

1)              The Cabinet Member for Children’s Services approved the recommendation to award a contract to Central London Community Healthcare (CLCH) for SLT services for Children and Young People from school age up to 25 for a period of 24 months commencing on 1st October 2020. The contract values were outlined in section 7 of the report.

 

1)              The current contract for the delivery of SLT Services (School Age to 25) was awarded in March 2019. This contract agreed to an award of 12 months with the option to extend for 6 months.

2)              The optional 6 month extension was taken up by the Executive Director for Children’s Services in March 2020 just before lockdown to ensure that the service were able to maintain delivery both of SLT and Covid Support Services locally.

3)              The current arrangement came to an end on 30th September 2020 and the paper proposed a new award to CLCH to continue delivering SLT services.

 

Lead officer: Sarah Newman


17/12/2020 - New Business Grants - Discretionary Schemes report ref: 1283    Recommendations Approved

Cabinet Member approval sought for proposals regarding new business grants involving discretionary schemes.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration

Decision published: 17/12/2020

Effective from: 17/12/2020

Decision:

That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the two proposed discretionary schemes as outlined in Section 5 of the report.

 

Reasons for Decision

The two proposed schemes seek to provide the most appropriate method to support the types of business that the government has requested that local authorities support within the Council’s relatively small funding allocations.


17/12/2020 - Realignment of Claimant Contact Facilities for the Council's Benefits service ref: 1282    Recommendations Approved

The recommendation in this report will realign the customer contact facilities available for Benefits service claimants following the experience of the current pandemic and will produce some medium term savings as other external buildings are vacated and released by other Council services.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration

Decision published: 17/12/2020

Effective from: 24/12/2020

Decision:

`1.      That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the Orchardson Street benefit reception site to not be re-opened and that the property is vacated by the Benefits service to enable bee other Council services to move into the building.

 

 

Reasons for Decision

 

1.              The recommendation in this report is made as it has been proved over the last nine months during the pandemic that the Council can provide the service in a different way. The various alternatives to face to face contact during this period have proved successful with no reduction in customer service to the borough’s claimants. These methods of contact include via the telephone, webchat, e-mail, on-line forms, white mail and the Council’s Benefits visiting service. In addition, in the future the Vauxhall Bridge Road Benefit reception site will re-open when it is considered safe to do so.

 

2.              The realignment of the customer contact facilities available for Benefits service claimants following the experience of the current pandemic will also produce some medium-term savings as other external buildings are vacated and released by other Council services.


11/12/2020 - Two-way operation on Aldwych and creation of "Meanwhile Strand" as part of the wider Strand Aldwych public realm scheme ref: 1281    Recommendations Approved

The report will be seeking the following approvals:
- approval to proceed with implementation of the proposals on Aldwych as part of the wider Strand Aldwych public realm scheme.
- approval to commit the funding to allow the implementation of the proposals on Aldwych

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Business and Planning

Decision published: 11/12/2020

Effective from: 11/12/2020

Decision:

That the Cabinet Member for Business and Planning agreed:

 

1.1         That the implementation of the proposed public realm improvements on both the Aldwych and the Strand as set out in section 4 and shown in the Background papers of this report be approved

1.2         That capital expenditure of £18,090,232 to carry out the implementation stage of the proposals of the Aldwych and Meanwhile measures on the Strand be approved. All costs to be funded by WCC funding covered in the Capital Strategy approved by Full Council on 4th March 2020.

1.3         That the Director of City Highways be delegated authority to approve minor modifications as necessary to the approved scheme, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Business and Planning and the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways.

That the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways agreed:

1.4         That approval to modify and make traffic regulation orders in accordance with the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984, necessary to accommodate the new two-way traffic movement on the Aldwych and associated highway improvements be approved.

 

1.5         That the Director of City Highways be delegated authority to approve minor modifications as necessary to the approved scheme, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Business and Planning and the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways.

 

1.6         That the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways concurs with the decisions of the Cabinet Member for Business and Planning to the extent that these are within his terms of reference

Reasons for Decision

To allow the implementation of the two-way traffic movement on the Aldwych and “Meanwhile Strand” as a first phase of the full Strand Aldwych scheme.  The scheme will achieve the project’s objectives to: support the area’s economy, improve air quality, improve links for walking and cycling, improve the public realm, support culture, education and innovation, and facilitate better and safer movement of traffic.  

 

Stuart Love, Chief Executive,

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON SW1E 6QP

Publication Date:

11 December 2020

Implementation Date:

 

18 December 2020 at 5pm

 

Wards affected: St James's;

Lead officer: Rebecca Cloke, Michelle Lucas-Jones


11/12/2020 - Approval of Expenditure from the Ward Budget of Abbey Road, Harrow Road, Maida Vale, Marylebone High Street and Regent’s Park ref: 1279    Recommendations Approved

This report seeks approval for the expenditure of £17,260.00 from the Abbey Road, Harrow Road, Maida Vale, Marylebone High Street and Regent’s Park Ward Budgets in order to commission:

(a) School Holiday Projects 2020-21 by Adventure Play Hub which will deliver full time play provision for children during school holidays in line with the Government guidance for Covid-19 protective measures for out-of-school settings.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital

Decision published: 11/12/2020

Effective from: 11/12/2020

Decision:

 

Summary of Decision

 

That the expenditure of £17,260 to commission School Holiday Projects 2020-21 by Adventure Play Hub which will deliver full time play provision for children during school holidaysin line with the Government guidance for Covid-19 protective measures for out-of-school settings, be approved.

 

Reason for Decision

 

The proposal in this report will support the Council’s wider equalities and diversity agenda by focusing on addressing local issues with enhanced local engagement. 

 

 

Stuart Love, Chief Executive,

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON SW1E 6QP

 

Publication Date:

11 December 2020

Implementation Date:

11 December 2020

Reference:

 

CMfCS&D/8/2020/21

 

Wards affected: Abbey Road; Harrow Road; Maida Vale; Marylebone; Regent's Park;

Lead officer: Janis Best


11/12/2020 - 1-5 Grosvenor Place public realm improvement project ref: 1280    Recommendations Approved

Public realm improvements around the new development for 1-5 Grosvenor Place. Improvements include footway widening on Grosvenor Crescent to improve pedestrian accessibility, inset Granite Sett parking bays proposed on Halkin Street, vehicle crossovers to be paved in Granite Setts at pavement level to maintain continuity of pedestrian movement, enhanced lighting, installation of new cycle stands on Grosvenor Crescent and Halkin Street, 6 new trees and improvements to existing carriageway and footway surface.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Business and Planning

Decision published: 11/12/2020

Effective from: 11/12/2020

Decision:

That the Cabinet Member for Business and Planning agreed:

 

1.1         That the detailed design and implementation of the proposed public realm improvements on both Halkin Mews and Grosvenor Crescent as set out in section 4 and shown in the Background papers of this report be approved.

1.2         That capital expenditure of £1,630,074 to carry out the detailed design and implementation of the proposals for Halkin Mews and Grosvenor Crescent be approved.  All costs to be funded by the developer under the requirements of the associated S106 agreement. 

1.3         That the Director of City Highways be delegated authority to approve minor modifications as necessary to the approved scheme, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Business and Planning and the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways.

That the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways agreed:

1.4         That approval to modify and make traffic regulation orders in accordance with the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984, necessary to accommodate the new highways improvements for the scheme be approved.

1.5          That the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways concurs with the decisions of the Cabinet Member for Business and Planning to the extent that these are within his terms of reference.

Reasons for Decision

To allow completion of public highway improvement works in accordance with the developments S106 obligations. The improvements will help to enhance the area, by improving provisions for walking and cycling, enhancing the public realm and facilitate better and safer movement of traffic.  

Stuart Love, Chief Executive,

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON SW1E 6QP

 

Publication Date:

11 December 2020

Implementation Date:

18 December 2020 at 5pm

 

 

 

Wards affected: Knightsbridge and Belgravia;

Lead officer: Michelle Lucas-Jones


10/12/2020 - Nomination and Appointment of Local Authority School Governors ref: 1278    Recommendations Approved

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Children's Services

Decision published: 10/12/2020

Effective from: 10/12/2020

Decision:

Recommendations

1)              That Appendix A to this report be exempt from public disclosure by virtue of paragraph 1 of Schedule 12a of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) – Information Relating to a Particular Individual.

 

2)              That the recommendations of the Local Authority School Governor’s Advisory Panel set out in Appendix A be approved.

 

Reasons for Decision 

 

Every maintained school governing body must contain at least one Local Authority nominated school governor.


07/12/2020 - Smart Cities-Variation to Contract with PwC ref: 1277    Recommendations Approved

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Community Services and Digital

Decision published: 07/12/2020

Effective from: 07/12/2020

Decision:

That the report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A Part 1, paragraph 3 (as amended), in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).

That the contract variation to the Smart City contract as set out in the report be approved.

 

Reasons for Decision 

 

This recommendation responds to the City Council’s commitments to creating great local places where people enjoy living, working and visiting; taking pride in our role as custodian of this great city, protecting our heritage by managing places and spaces that can be enjoyed now and in the future and creating places and opportunities for everyone in the city to be physically active and play a role in their community.

 

 

Stuart Love, Chief Executive,

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON SW1E 6QP

 

Publication Date:

7 December 2020

Implementation Date:

7 December 2020

Reference:

 

CMfCS&D/9/2020/21

 

Lead officer: Brett McKee


04/12/2020 - Church Street Green Spine Project – report on Traffic Order consultation and implementation ref: 1276    Recommendations Approved

That approval be given to proceed with implementation of the proposed scheme, including the capital expenditure

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration

Decision published: 04/12/2020

Effective from: 12/12/2020

Decision:

1.            That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration:

 

(a)  Approved the implementation of the proposed public realm improvements for Phase 1 as shown in Appendix B of the report (‘Green Spine Phase 1 works’);  

 

(b)  Approved the capital expenditure of £6,297,749 to carry out the implementation of Green Spine Phase 1 works; and

 

(c)   Delegated to the Executive Director of Growth, Planning and Housing the decision to approve non-material amendments as necessary to the scheme, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration and with the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways.

2.        That the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways gave approval to modify and make traffic regulation orders in accordance with the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984, necessary to accommodate the changes to prescribed routes, parking layout, and associated highway improvements.

Reasons for Decision

To deliver transformational improvements to the public realm along Salisbury Street and Lisson Street as a key element of the Council’s Church Street Masterplan.  The project converts roads and footways to parkland, helping to address the deficiency in public open space in the area and create a much more attractive and vibrant place for both the community and visitors.

Wards affected: Church Street;

Lead officer: Rebecca Cloke, Simon Morgan


04/12/2020 - NNDR Hardship Awards 2020/21 ref: 1275    Recommendations Approved

Cabinet Member approval sought for approval of Hardship Awards recommendations.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration

Decision published: 04/12/2020

Effective from: 12/12/2020

Decision:

1.               That Appendix B of the report be declared exempt from publication as, the business to be transacted involves the disclosure of information as prescribed by paragraph 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 12a of the Local Government Act 1972 relating to information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority).

 

2.               That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the award of grants to the businesses as set out in Appendix B of the report.

 

 

Reasons for Decisions 

The proposed awards have each met the mandatory requirements of the National Non-Domestic Rates Hardship Relief applications specific to the 2020/21 financial year and have been given a sufficient evaluation score to qualify for a grant.


30/11/2020 - Victoria Neighbourhood Forum Re-Designation ref: 1274    Recommendations Approved

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Business and Planning

Decision published: 30/11/2020

Effective from: 30/11/2020

Decision:

Summary of Decision

 

That the Victoria Neighbourhood Forum be re-designated for a further period of 5 years and a formal designation notice be published under delegated authority by the Director of Policy and Projects.

Reasons for Decision 

 

The City Council is required to assess whether the purpose of the neighbourhood forum reflects (in general terms) the character of the area. The application submitted by the Forum for re-designation states that the Forum was established to promote: A good mix of facilities and amenities, a healthier environment, a good quality physical environment, a low carbon footprint and local employment and enterprise. The statement of purpose within the application also outlines that the forum will improve the social, economic and environmental wellbeing of the area using its planning influence.

 

Consultation on the re-designation of the Victoria Neighbourhood Forum highlighted support for the application, no objections, or competing applications.

 

Stuart Love,

Chief Executive,

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON SW1E 6QP

 

Publication Date:

 

30 November 2020

Implementation Date:

 

30 November 2020

Reference:

 

CMfB&P/10/2020/21

 

Wards affected: St James's; Vincent Square; Warwick;

Lead officer: Sean Walsh


30/11/2020 - Pimlico Neighbourhood Forum Re-Designation ref: 1273    Recommendations Approved

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Business and Planning

Decision published: 30/11/2020

Effective from: 30/11/2020

Decision:

That the Pimlico Neighbourhood Forum be re-designated for a further period of 5 years and a formal designation notice be published under delegated authority by the Director of Policy and Projects.

The City Council is required to assess whether the purpose of the neighbourhood forum reflects (in general terms) the character of the area. The application submitted by the Forum for re-designation states that the Forum was established to promote: A good mix of facilities and amenities, a healthier environment, a good quality physical environment, a low carbon footprint and local employment and enterprise. The statement of purpose within the application also outlines that the forum will improve the social, economic and environmental wellbeing of the area using its planning influence.

 

Consultation on the re-designation of the Pimlico Neighbourhood Forum highlighted support for the application, no objections, or competing applications.

 

 

Stuart Love,

Chief Executive,

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON SW1E 6QP

 

Publication Date:

 

30 November 2020

Implementation Date:

 

30 November 2020

Reference:

 

CMfB&P/9/2020/21

 

Wards affected: Churchill; Tachbrook; Warwick;

Lead officer: Sean Walsh


26/11/2020 - Rating Advisory Panel 27th October 2020: Determination of National Non-Domestic Rates Discretionary and Hardship Relief Applications ref: 1270    Recommendations Approved

Cabinet Member approval for the Rating Advisory Panel sought.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration

Decision published: 26/11/2020

Effective from: 26/11/2020

Decision:

1.              That this report and appendices be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972 Schedule 12A, Part 1, Paragraph 3, as amended, in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of an individual.

 

2.        That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration approved the recommendations of the Rating Advisory Panel held on 27th October 2020 and determined the applications for National Non-Discretionary Rates and Hardship relief as set out in Appendix A of the report.

 

Reasons for Decision

 

The Rating Advisory Panel has set out the reasons for the recommendations in each case considered by the Panel in the recommendations in Appendix A of the report,


20/11/2020 - Council Tax COVID-19 Hardship Fund 2020/21 ref: 1268    Recommendations Approved

Approval for additional expenditure from the remaining balance of the Council’s allocation from the Council Tax COVID-18 Hardship Fund.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration

Decision published: 20/11/2020

Effective from: 28/11/2020

Decision:

1.        That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration agreed that the Council utilises the balance of the Council’s funding allocation from the Council Tax Covid-19 Hardship Fund to support the recommended areas of expenditure as outlined in Section 5 of this report.

 

2.        That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration agreed to delegate authority to the Executive Director of Finance and Resources to flex the level of funding to be allocated against each area in order to address future changing circumstances arising from the pandemic; with the aim being to utilise all the £2.2m funding allocation by 31 March 2021.

 

3.        That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration noted that a further Cabinet Member report be submitted in late January / early February 2021 to address any forecast remaining balance at 31 March 2021.

 

 

Reasons for Decisions

 

The recommendations in this report will ensure that the government funding provided under Council Tax COVID-19 Hardship Fund 2020/21 is allocated to the most appropriate areas to assist the financial circumstances of residents in 2020/21.


16/11/2020 - Arundel Court ref: 1267    Recommendations Approved

Developer funded highways/public realm improvement scheme. Installation of natural stone, raised tables, trees, planting, pedestrian and cycle facilities.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways

Decision published: 16/11/2020

Effective from: 25/11/2020

Decision:

2.        Recommendations

 

2.2      Approval was granted by the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highwaysto undertake Detailed Design and Implementation of the proposed Arundel Court Public Ream Improvements Project.

 

2.3      The Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways approved capital expenditure to the sum of £3,152,791(included a Risk & Contingency of £373,881) to complete the scheme.

 

 

3.        Reasons for Decision 

 

3.1      The proposed scheme will contribute to the adopted November 2013 and subsequent updated November 2016 City of Westminster City Plan objectives. It is intended that this scheme will:

 

 

·         Improve the public realm and pedestrian facilities.

·         Provide legible and safer routes for cycle traffic.

·         Improve health by encouraging more everyday journeys to be made by active transportation. Improvements to pedestrian facilities are also proposed as part of the scheme.

·         Encourage more people to cycle by implementing a scheme suitable for all people who want to cycle in the area, particularly those wishing to avoid some of the busier, highly trafficked main roads.

·         Reduce CO2 emissions in part by encouraging modal shift from private motor vehicles to walking, cycling and public transport.

 

3.2      Public realm improvements formed part of S106 Planning obligations associated with Ref. 11/05626/FULL.

 

Wards affected: St James's;

Lead officer: Hayden Tuck


16/11/2020 - Royal Albert Hall Security and Highways Improvements ref: 1266    Recommendations Approved

To approve an initial design and the capital expenditure to implement security measures and a series of highways improvements in the vicinity of the Royal Albert Hall.

To grant approval to enter into a Section 278 agreement for the works and to proceed to detailed design and implementation of the scheme.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways

Decision published: 16/11/2020

Effective from: 25/11/2020

Decision:

2.          Recommendations

2.1        That this report is exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A Part 1, paragraph 14 (as amended), in that it contains information relating to action to be taken in connection with the prevention investigation or prosecution of a crime.

 

2.2        The Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways granted approval to commit to capital expenditure to deliver the scheme and to enter into an Agreement under Section 278 of the Highways Act 1980, in order to progress to detailed design stage and implement a security and highways scheme.

 

2.3        Delegated authority was given to the Acting Executive Director of City Management and Communities to allow minor modifications as necessary to the approved scheme, in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways.

 

 

3.          Reasons for Decision

 

3.1        The proposed public realm improvements identified in this report, will reduce the vulnerability of the Royal Albert Hall and immediate surroundings to a terrorist attack utilising a vehicle as a weapon attack methodology or a penetrative vehicle borne improvised explosive device attack methodology.

 

3.2        Implementation of a series of highways improvements to provide added pedestrian safety and comfort, increase accessibility, enhance the experience of visitors to the area and encourage active travel.

 

3.2        To address a potentially unsafe crossing by implementing a new wider upgraded pedestrian crossing.

 

Wards affected: Knightsbridge and Belgravia;

Lead officer: Jerry Warner


06/11/2020 - Church Street (Site A) Serving Demolition Notices ref: 1263    Recommendations Approved

Authorisation for the Council to serve Initial Demolition Notices to all Church Street, Site A occupants (residing in blocks Blackwater, Cray, Ingrebourne, Lambourne and Pool House), which will in effects suspend all Right to Buy applications.

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration

Decision published: 06/11/2020

Effective from: 06/11/2020

Decision:

That the Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration:

 

(a)            Authorised the principle of serving of Demolition Notices (Initial and Final) in accordance with the Housing Act 1985, on Church Street Site A residents (being residents at Blackwater House, Cray House, Ingrebourne House, Lambourne House and Pool House such properties more particularly set out in section 5.5 of this report), and

(b)            Delegated approval of all related documentation and service of such Demolition Notices (Initial and Final) on Church Street Site A residents to the Executive Director of Growth Planning and Housing.

 

Reasons for Decision

 

The reason for this decision is that the Council anticipates demolition of properties in Site A within a period of seven years and therefore it is desirable to serve appropriate notices to reduce risk and cost for the Council.

Wards affected: Church Street;

Lead officer: Sarah Crampton


06/11/2020 - Marble Arch BID Renewal & Alteration Ballot ref: 1264    Recommendations Approved

Marble Arch BID Renewal & Alteration Ballot

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Business and Planning

Decision published: 06/11/2020

Effective from: 06/11/2020

Decision:

Summary of Decision

 

  1. That the Marble Arch London BID’s Renewal & Alteration Proposal be endorsed.

 

  1. That the Chief Executive be requested as the City Council’s Returning Officer and “ballot holder” to hold a ballot for Marble Arch London BID in respect of their proposed Renewal & Alteration Proposal be approved.

 

  1. That the Director of Law be authorised on behalf of the City Council to enter into the necessary legal agreements for collection of the BID Levy service specifications for all services which the City Council is required to deliver throughout the BID’s term and any other necessary legal matters for the BID as instructed and in consultation with the appropriate officers.

 

Reasons for Decision

Marble Arch London BID has a strong collaborative relationship with the City Council. Examples include:

·       Large public realm schemes, Marble Arch being the major one currently under consideration - a transformative scheme led by The Portman Estate will create a high-quality, safe civic space. The scheme aims to improve road safety, alongside better walking and cycling connections, creating an accessible and healthier environment with improved air quality. 

·       Small scale public realm schemes, in partnership with Hyde Park Paddington Neighbourhood Forum, through Neighbourhood CIL and designed and delivered by WCC Highways.

·       Street Team and staff team regularly report environmental conditions, problem solving and snagging with Highways and Cleansing.

·       Street Team monitor and refer rough sleepers to agencies, and deal with a host of local ASB. The BID participates in regular street counts with WCC and promotes the Hidden Network.

·       The BID funds a dedicated Neighbourhood Co-ordinator at the Council, and feed in all intelligence to the Council for joint operations.

·       Since the launch of the BID’s Community Programme in 2016, it has supported 28 Marble Arch member companies to build relationships with more than 20 local schools, charities, and social enterprises. To date, Marble Arch businesses have donated over 1,000 hours of volunteering to the local community.

·       The BID’s Community Programme directly supported the response to the COVID-19 public health crisis proving vital companionship and support to local residents and connecting charities and schools with hotels, venues and offices, distributing surplus food, clothing and toiletries. The BID brought together nine local schools to help create a rainbow themed thank you mural for the 200 key workers staying at the Hilton London Metropole during the height of the pandemic.

It is anticipated that Marble Arch London BID will continue to play an active part in the joint working arrangements the City Council has set up for BIDs to liaise with City Council members and officers, to enable new ideas, plans and initiatives of mutual concern to be discussed prior to public launch. Officers will also continue to encourage Marble Arch London BID as with all BIDs to work collaboratively with each other on joint initiatives so as to avoid duplication of resources and contact with the City Council.

 

This report describes the BID’s Renewal & Alteration Proposal that has been 

submitted by Marble Arch London BID to continue into a second term. These do not conflict with City Council policies.

 

 

Stuart Love, Chief Executive,

Westminster City Hall,

64 Victoria Street

LONDON SW1E 6QP

 

Publication Date:

 

6 November 2020

Implementation Date

 

6 November 2020

 

 

 

Wards affected: Bryanston and Dorset Square; Church Street; Hyde Park; Knightsbridge and Belgravia; Little Venice; West End;

Lead officer: Haylea Asadi


24/11/2020 - Waste Collection and Street Cleansing Contract Extension ref: 1269    Recommendations Approved

Extension of Waste Collection and Street Cleansing Contract with Veolia ES Ltd. from September 2020 to September 2024

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Finance, Property and Regeneration

Decision published: 25/08/2020

Effective from: 03/09/2020

Decision:

1.          That this report be exempt from disclosure by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A Part 1, paragraph 3 (as amended), in that it contains information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information).

 

2.              That the Cabinet Member for Environment and Highways and the Cabinet Member for Finance and Regeneration approved the extension of the Waste and Recycling Collection, Street Cleansing and Ancillary Services Contract with the organisation as set out in the report. for one year from 16th September 2020 to 15th September 2021.

3.              That the Cabinet Member for Environment & City Management and the Cabinet Member for Finance and Regeneration approved the continuation of the Food Waste and Recycling Processing contracts with the organisation as set out in the report. to be coterminous with the main contract to 15th September 2021.

 

Reasons for Decision

 

The scale of change to both how waste services operate and are funded from 2023 requires a new strategic approach to future waste management in Westminster. The social and economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic on Westminster and its implications for waste and cleansing services will also need to be fully assessed. This requires an investment of time and external challenge to ensure that the services we procure in future not only meet the changing legislative requirements but also future proof the services for the longer term. An extension of one year provides the time to develop the strategy to prepare for future challenges.

Wards affected: (All Wards);